Cucumis - Besplatan online prevodilački servis

Home

Registruj se

. .

•‎Home
•‎Podnošenje novog teksta na prevod
•‎Traženi prevodi
•‎Završeni prevodi
•‎

Omiljeni prevodi
•‎

•‎Prevod web stranice
•‎Traži

▪Besplatna razmena stranih jezika

•‎English
•‎Türkçe
•‎Français
•‎Español
•‎Italiano
•‎Português brasileiro
•‎Deutsch
•‎Română
•‎عربي
•‎Русский
•‎Svenska
•‎Ελληνικά
•‎Български
•‎עברית
•‎Shqip

▪▪‎Srpski

•‎Nederlands
•‎Dansk
•‎Português
•‎Polski
•‎汉语(简体)
•‎Lietuvių
•‎Norsk
•‎فارسی
•‎Suomi
•‎Hrvatski
•‎日本語
•‎Català
•‎Esperanto
•‎한국어
•‎Українська
•‎Føroyskt
•‎नेपाली
•‎Kiswahili

Prevod - Francuski-Engleski - Les organisations internationales sont donc impuissantes?

Trenutni status ‎Prevod

Ovaj tekst je raspoloziv na sledecim jezicima:

Francuski

Engleski

Italijanski

Grcki

Spanski

Nemacki

Portugalski brazilski

Svedski

Holandski

Danski

Rumunski

Bugarski

Persijski jezik

Ruski

Kineski pojednostavljeni

Norveski

Turski

Kategorija Novine - Drustvo/Ljudi/Politika

Natpis	Les organisations internationales sont donc impuissantes?
Tekst Podnet od Francky5591	Izvorni jezik: Francuski En quelques annÃ©es, le programme alimentaire mondial a perdu la moitiÃ© de son budget, qui n'est plus que de 3,2 milliards. Les pays riches ne cotisent plus. Ils doivent sauver leurs banques. C'est Ã dire les spÃ©culateurs. La lutte contre la faim dans le monde passe aprÃ¨s. J'appelle cela un crime contre l'humanitÃ©.
Napomene o prevodu	Propos de Jean Ziegler, recueillis par un quotidien rÃ©gional franÃ§ais, au sujet de son livre "Destruction massive".

Natpis	So, are international organizations powerless?
Prevod Engleski Preveo alexfatt	Željeni jezik: Engleski Within the space of a few years, the World Food Programme has lost half its budget, which amounts to no more than 3.2 billion. Rich countries do not contribute anymore. They have to rescue their banks. That is to say the speculators. The fight against world hunger is secondary. I call this a crime against humanity.

Poslednja provera i obrada od Lein - 31 Oktobar 2011 15:27

Poslednja poruka

	Autor	Poruka
		29 Oktobar 2011 00:16
	gamine Broj poruka: 4611	'In the last/recent years' instead of 'within the space of a few years'. 'That is to say the spÃ©culators'. Something sounds wrong her. Couldn't one just say: 'the speculators' or 'which are the speculators'. Sure you can find somehing, Lein.
		29 Oktobar 2011 03:49
	gamine Broj poruka: 4611	Forgot the tittle: I would say 'So, are the international organizations powerless? '
		29 Oktobar 2011 13:28
	Francky5591 Broj poruka: 12396	Agree about the title, Lene, Alex should add "are" in the interrogation mode ("are international organizations powerless?" But the rest is OK IMO.
		29 Oktobar 2011 15:07
	gamine Broj poruka: 4611	ok boss. I believe you. It's just sounded weird to me, but, as you know, my English .
		29 Oktobar 2011 15:31
	alexfatt Broj poruka: 1538	I should have placed "are" before the subject indeed. Thanks for your comments, Lene
		29 Oktobar 2011 20:55
	itsatrap100 Broj poruka: 279	The translation seems fine to me, but I'm a bit unsure of the meaning of "plus" in the second sentence. Surely the rich countries are contributing quite a bit of food since they are the countries with the most food surplus.
		30 Oktobar 2011 00:20
	gamine Broj poruka: 4611	Hi Alex. It was absolutely nothing. You are a real good translater and expert and help so much. Wish all our translaters were as good, I included
		30 Oktobar 2011 13:25
	Francky5591 Broj poruka: 12396	Hi Jens! "ne...plus" here was translated the right way, into French it makes no ambiguity at all, it is translatable with "not...anymore". Have a nice afternoon!
		31 Oktobar 2011 15:27
	Lein Broj poruka: 3389	Thanks all Accepted