Переклад - Французька-Англійська - slm sana cevap yazmak istemiyordum

Поточний статус ‎Переклад

Цей текст можна переглянути такими мовами:

Категорія Нелітературна мова

Заголовок

slm sana cevap yazmak istemiyordum

Текст
Публікацію зроблено

ozan_1881

Мова оригіналу: Французька Переклад зроблено aysunca

Salut, je ne voulais pas t'Ã©crire de rÃ©ponse, je voulais te parler en face Ã face Ã ton arrivÃ©e. Je te comprends, je suis fautif mais ils ont tellement grossi les choses que rien n'est comme tu le penses. Tu ne m'as pas laissÃ© seul avec moi-mÃªme, je te l'ai tellement demandÃ©. Tu Ã©tais trÃ¨s spÃ©ciale pour moi, je t'ai beaucoup aimÃ©e, mais c'est d'abord toi qui a fini aussi cet amour, je sais trÃ¨s bien quelle est mon erreur et je la reconnais. Quoi que tu penses sur moi tu es toujours trÃ¨s spÃ©ciale pour moi.

Заголовок	I didn't want to reply to you in writing, ...
Переклад Англійська Переклад зроблено jollyo	Мова, якою перекладати: Англійська I didn't want to reply to you in writing, I wanted to talk to you face to face at your arrival. I understand you, I am wrong, but they have extensively magnified things, and nothing is as you think. You have not left me to myself, I've requested you this explicitely. You were very special to me, I have loved you very much, but it was you in the first place who has also ended this love. I know very well what my mistake is and I recognize that. Whatever you think of me, you are still very special to me.
Пояснення стосовно перекладу	The parenthetic words are optional. They might add to the intent of the text. Jollyo

Затверджено lilian canale

- 10 Вересня 2008 16:19

Останні повідомлення

	Автор	Повідомлення
		2 Вересня 2008 03:46
	lilian canale Кількість повідомлень: 14972	Hi jollyo, I have two changes to make; "I know very well what my mistake is" "Whatever you think of me, you are still very special to me." I'd also use "that" instead of "this" What do you think?
		2 Вересня 2008 04:05
	jollyo Кількість повідомлень: 330	The only thing I do not follow is your suggestion of changing: you will always be ... into you are still ... tu es toujours: you are always... ?? Can you explain? The other two are good changes. Thank you. (the first one must have been a typo, 'cause I know this is the right sequence...) So far adapted.
		2 Вересня 2008 04:43
	lilian canale Кількість повідомлень: 14972	"toujours" may have several meanings, it's not always "always". It may be 'still', 'yet', 'never cease', etc And I think in this text what it means is "still". That's what makes sense, don't you think? Read the whole text again and tell me if it doesn't sound better.
		2 Вересня 2008 05:50
	turkishmiss Кількість повідомлень: 2132	I agree with Lilian the last sentence is : tu es toujours (encore) trÃ¨s spÃ©ciale pour moi. you are still very special to me. In French the meaning of "you will always be very special to me." is "tu seras toujours trÃ¨s spÃ©ciale pour moi"
		2 Вересня 2008 12:00
	jollyo Кількість повідомлень: 330	Hi Turkishmiss, I am aware that the future tense in the last sentence is not actually written in French. In English future tense is used more often than in French, whenever there is something mentioned that points to the future. Anyway... Lilian, I think both translations work: 'you will always be very special' has to me the intention to say that whatever happened, or whatever you think of me, whatever choice we make 'you will always be etc. If you still feel it should be 'you are still very special...' it's okay with me. Tell me what your opinion is Lilian and I will edit if needed.
		2 Вересня 2008 12:13
	guilon Кількість повідомлень: 1549	Jollyo, I also think "toujours" means "still" in this text. "Toujours" is a synonym for "encore" and I think Miss explained very well why it couldn't be "always" or "forever"
		8 Вересня 2008 22:44
	Shaneeae Кількість повідомлень: 55	I've requested you this explicitely. => I've asked you this explicitly.
		8 Вересня 2008 23:09
	gamine Кількість повідомлень: 4611	Only one sentence . they have extensively magnified"===>they have amplified so much, but I can be wrong!!
		9 Вересня 2008 02:24
	Shaneeae Кількість повідомлень: 55	I would say it this way: I am wrong, but they have extensively magnified things, and nothing is as you think. ==> I am at fault, but they have exaggerated so much that nothing is as you think.