 | |
|
번역 - 네덜란드어-영어 - Stelling van donderdag 31 januari 2008 Nederland...현재 상황 번역
분류 웹사이트 / 블로그 / 포럼 - 뉴스 / 현재 상황들  이 번역의 "의미" 번역만을 요구합니다. | Stelling van donderdag 31 januari 2008 Nederland... | | 원문 언어: 네덜란드어
Stelling van donderdag 31 januari 2008:
Nederland moet blij zijn met Beatrix als koningin
eens - oneens | | اريد ترجمه هذا التصويت بيتكلم Ù† ماذا؟باللغهالعربية الÙصØÙ‰ او السعودية.ضروري عاجلاً..بسبب اني عرÙت ان هذا التصويت يتكلم عن منع وق٠القرأن ÙÙŠ هولندا..Ùهل هذا التصويت صØÙŠØ؟ام بيتكلم عن خبر أخر؟ |
|
 거절되어진 번역물 | Thursday 's phrase, January 31, 2008 Netherlands | | 번역될 언어: 영어
Thursday's phrase, January 31, 2008:
The Netherlands must be happy with Beatrix as queen.
agree - disagree
|
|
Tantine에 의해서 거절되었습니다 - 2008년 2월 24일 23:48
마지막 글 | | | | |
2008년 2월 8일 23:54 | | | Oi Hitchock 
Maybe you should put "The" Netherlands? It may read easier that way. The rest seems fine to me, but I don't speak Dutch, so I've polled
Bises 
Tantine | | |
2008년 2월 9일 10:21 | | | It looks OK if the word 'phrase' is used to describe the proposition of a poll. "The Netherlands", and 'should' is closer to the proper meaning of [moet] then 'must', although the latter is the literal translation. | | |
2008년 2월 9일 12:27 | | | I totally agree with Nego. | | |
2008년 2월 9일 13:49 | | | Hi Nego Martijn , Hitchcock
I think it most likely is to do with a poll, as you suggest Nego , seeing the category.
Hitchcock, can you edit as per suggestions please
Bises
Tantine | | |
2008년 2월 12일 15:34 | | | The Netherlands has to be happy with Beatrix as her queen. | | |
2008년 2월 13일 20:26 | | 
JW게시물 갯수: 6 | "The Netherlands should be happy with Beatrix as their queen.", as Nego suggested, seems to be the best translation to me. "must", or "has to" as Ida-alida suggests, sounds much stronger than "should", and I think the Dutch is closer to the latter one. | | |
2008년 2월 14일 08:06 | | | I like JW's choice. The intention, as far as I can tell, is to find out how pleased the Dutch are with their queen.
| | |
2008년 2월 14일 08:56 | | | Good point. Under normal circumstances, I would always have chosen for 'should', because a sentence like this is is usually preceded by an argument in favour of her (to persuade people who criticise her). But given the fact that it's an agree/disagree statement, 'must' might be better. It comes down to what english native speakers would choose I think. | | |
2008년 2월 20일 15:47 | | | thursday's phrase doesn't mean whatu written | | |
2008년 2월 20일 18:06 | | | Thanks seyed mohammad mousavi
But if it doesn't mean what is written, what does it mean?
Bises
Tantine
|
|
| |
|
좋아하는 번역문
