Cucumis - שירות תרגום מקוון חינם
. .



תרגום - דנית-איטלקית - Lær mig at kende, og se, hvem jeg er (: ...

מצב נוכחיתרגום
הטקסט נגיש בשפות הבאות: דניתפורטוגזית ברזילאיתאיטלקיתלטינית

שם
Lær mig at kende, og se, hvem jeg er (: ...
טקסט
נשלח על ידי Himmelhunden
שפת המקור: דנית

Lær mig at kende, og se, hvem jeg er (:
Er ikke en skuespiller, men en person i virkelighedens spillefilm blandt andre..
הערות לגבי התרגום
Bridge by Bamsa:
"Learn to know me and see who I am.
I am not an actor, but a person in the real life movie, among others."

שם
Impara a conoscermi e guarda chi sono.
תרגום
איטלקית

תורגם על ידי alexfatt
שפת המטרה: איטלקית

Impara a conoscermi e guarda chi sono (:
Non sono un attore, ma una persona nel film della vita reale, fra gli altri.
אושר לאחרונה ע"י alexfatt - 16 ינואר 2012 17:23





הודעה אחרונה

מחבר
הודעה

13 ינואר 2012 18:46

lilian canale
מספר הודעות: 14972
vedrai ---> vedi

13 ינואר 2012 18:54

alexfatt
מספר הודעות: 1538
"Vedrai chi sono" is a set phrase. Using an imperative is correct but, you know, unusual.

13 ינואר 2012 21:04

lilian canale
מספר הודעות: 14972
But IMO, the future tense implies a condition.
"(If you) learn to know me you'll see who I am"

I think the original (as it was bridged) means:
"Learn to know me (and) see who I am" (do both things - one does not depend on the other)

13 ינואר 2012 22:28

alexfatt
מספר הודעות: 1538
Thanks for your comments Lilian, but I'm afraid I don't understand.

"Learn to know me" and "See who I am" are not related? Logically I can't imagine doing both things without them being related. Of course, only after learning to know someone you see who (s)he is. "See who I am" happens necessarily after, in my humble opinion. That's why the set phrase appears mostly at the future tense in Italian. It's often placed after imperatives, i.e. "Lascialo fare e vedrai chi è" - "Dagli gli strumenti e vedrai che farà" etc.

I mean, it barely makes sense to me to consider the two actions happening at the same time and not related.
I hope not to spend too much time on a simple issue.


13 ינואר 2012 23:51

lilian canale
מספר הודעות: 14972
I know what you mean. Your version sounds more "familiar", but as I said, according to Bamsa's bridge the verb tense should be imperative.
Anyway... even if I agree with you that this does not deserve too much discussion, I'd like Bamsa's input about the exact meaning in the original and if the future tense could be acceptable as well, ok?

@ Ernst? What do you say?

CC: Bamsa

15 ינואר 2012 21:59

Bamsa
מספר הודעות: 1524
Hi
"Lær" is imperative.
If it was future, there should be an auxiliary verb + the infinitive of the verb.

15 ינואר 2012 22:07

alexfatt
מספר הודעות: 1538
Ok. To avoid the resulting oddity, I'll just use a different verb.

Thanks a lot Ernst and Lilian